Carbon Clean 200®:
Investing in a Clean Energy Future
2023 Performance Update
The Clean200® is an educational tool intended to give individuals the ability to research companies that are effectively balancing people, planet, and profit. The Clean200 list may be used by individuals free of charge. All commercial investment products derived from the Clean200 require a license. Contact [email protected] and/or Corporate Knights Inc. for further information.
Foreword
Just a few years ago, much of the business community viewed climate advocates with indifference or skepticism. Today, companies representing 40% of the global stock market have committed to science-based targets around reducing their greenhouse gas emissions in line with the Paris Agreement. In many cases, these businesses are already making billions of dollars supplying climate solutions to the market. Even corporations that are less directly implicated in the economic upside of climate action recognize the imperative for a low-carbon economy because no business can profit in an environment of climate chaos.
Yet, despite this reality being clear as day, we are plodding along on climate action. Worse, a handful of laggard companies and their pliant industry associations continue to advocate against climate action and for business as usual. The first thing we need to do is cut the poison that is at the heart of our climate breakdown.
That means finally cutting out the annual US$6 trillion in subsidies to fossil fuel companies that accounts for two-thirds of global greenhouse gas emissions.
It also means cutting off financing for new fossil fuel projects, which HSBC (one of the largest banks in the world) and Lloyds (the largest domestic bank in the U.K.) have done for new oil and gas fields – with some caveats.
And it means stopping all finance for activities that are killing our forests. Deforestation accounts for 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions, more than comes out of the tailpipes of all 1.4 billion cars on the world’s roads. If we went a step further than putting a stop to ripping out our forests and mangroves and started to restore them, we could get almost 40% of the way to our Paris Agreement goals by 2030.
But as former Bank of England (and Canada) governor Mark Carney has made clear, “the biggest threat to achieving 1.5 degrees is the speed at which we invest, not divest. We need at least $4 in clean energy investment for every $1 maintaining fossil fuels until we can phase them out by the end of this decade.”
The good news is that over the past decade, the flow of money into clean energy and efficiency infrastructure has tripled to about US$1 trillion annually. According to research from Bloomberg, global investments in clean energy transition reached US$1.1 trillion in 2022. This amount was roughly equal to the amount invested in fossil fuel production in the same year.
The Clean200 lists the 200 major corporate players from 35 countries around the world that are at the forefront of this transition. These are the companies that are leading the way by putting sustainability at the heart of their products, services, business models and investments, helping to move the world onto a more sustainable trajectory.
This year’s Clean200 companies rose to the top of a pool of 6,720 global firms based on rigorous assessment of the amount of revenue each company earns from products and services aligned with the Corporate Knights Sustainable Economy Taxonomy, while also ensuring that their businesses are not fundamentally offside important criteria for socially responsible investors, including being a company flagged by As You Sow’s Invest Your Values platform, which identifies fossil fuels, weapons, private prisons, thermal coal or having a record of systemically obstructing climate policy.
Key Findings:
Geographically, the Americas and Europe account for 38.5% and 31.5% respectively of this year’s Clean200, while the remaining 60 companies are headquartered in the Asia Pacific region. The United States dominated the 2023 list, with 42 companies on the Clean200, while China had the second-largest share with 21, followed by Japan, which is headquarters to 16 Clean200 companies.
On average, 58.3% of revenues earned by Clean200 companies are classified as sustainable, representing close to $2.4 trillion in revenue, roughly unchanged from last year and significantly above the 5% average sustainable revenue for their MSCI ACWI peers.
Of note, it was found that on average, 44.4% of the capital expenditure, acquisitions, and research and development expenses among the Clean200 companies were defined as sustainable by the Corporate Knights Sustainable Economy Taxonomy, compared to only 7% among MSCI ACWI constituents.
Of the 2023 Clean200 companies, the Information Technology sector accounted for nearly a quarter of the total sustainable revenue at $586 billion, followed by the Communications Services sector ($542 billion) and the Industrials sector ($400 billion). On Sustainable Investments, the Utilities and Industrials sector led with $50 billion each, followed by the Communications Services sector at $24 billion in Sustainable Investments.
U.S. companies had, on average, the highest Sustainable Revenue at $23 billion. This is followed by Germany with $18 billion and South Korea at $17 billion.
But none of this would have legs if the Clean200 weren’t also faring well financially. On this score, as of January 31, 2023, the Clean200 outperformed its MSCI ACWI peers by 3.36% since the Clean200 was launched in July of 2016. Clean200 companies generated a total return of 91.21%, beating the MSCI ACWI broad market index (87.84%) and MSCI ACWI/Energy Index of fossil fuel companies (61.31%) on Total Return Gross — USD Basis from the Clean200 inception of July 1, 2016, to January 31, 2023.
To put that in context: US$10,000 invested in the Clean200 on July 1, 2016, would have grown to $19,121 by January 31, 2023, versus $18,784 for the MSCI ACWI broad market benchmark and $16,131 for the MSCI ACWI/Energy benchmark for fossil fuel companies.
Looking Ahead:
This decade we need to move faster, quadrupling current levels of investment to the US$4 trillion annually (4% of global GDP) that is required, according to the International Energy Agency.
Finance ministers hold the keys to unlocking climate action. Fortunately, a new group, called the Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action, from more than 80 countries, is looking to shift the view of climate action from a cost to a unique growth and investment opportunity. These finance ministers recognize that the current energy crisis and growing incidence of climate hazards are an opportunity for more, not less, action. And a rapid switch to renewable energy presents an opportunity for countries to deliver clean, cheap, secure energy and new employment at the same time.
Finance ministers globally manage huge annual budgets that collectively add up to around 30% of gross domestic product. Mobilizing 4% of global GDP for climate action is not going to happen without backing from heads of state, most critically those from the G20 countries. It is a tall task but one with precedent. It wasn’t that long ago that governments mobilized trillions of dollars to keep businesses and workers afloat during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Corporate Knights and As You Sow are pleased to present the latest edition of the Clean200 to help investors identify the companies that are leading the charge on providing climate solutions while outperforming both the broad-based benchmark and its high-carbon global counterparts.
Clean200 vs MSCI ACWI vs MSCI ACWI/Energy
(July 1, 2016–Jan. 31, 2023, Total Return USD Gross)
Clean200 Companies by Sector
GICS Sector | # of Clean200 Companies |
---|---|
Industrials | 49 |
Information Technology | 34 |
Materials | 30 |
Utilities | 26 |
Consumer Discretionary | 17 |
Communication Services | 16 |
Health Care | 10 |
Financials | 9 |
Consumer Staples | 6 |
Real Estate | 3 |
Clean200 Companies by Country
Country | # of Clean200 Companies |
---|---|
United States | 42 |
China | 21 |
Japan | 16 |
Canada | 12 |
France | 11 |
Brazil | 10 |
Germany | 10 |
Cayman Islands | 8 |
Netherlands | 6 |
United Kingdom | 6 |
Spain | 5 |
Taiwan | 5 |
Switzerland | 4 |
Finland | 4 |
Ireland | 4 |
Singapore | 3 |
Denmark | 3 |
Bermuda | 3 |
South Korea | 3 |
Belgium | 2 |
Australia | 2 |
Italy | 2 |
Hong Kong | 2 |
Thailand | 2 |
Philippines | 2 |
Sweden | 2 |
India | 2 |
Mexico | 1 |
Turkey | 1 |
Portugal | 1 |
Norway | 1 |
Colombia | 1 |
New Zealand | 1 |
Austria | 1 |
Poland | 1 |
The Clean200® Methodology
The Clean200 are the largest 200 public companies ranked by clean revenue. The ranking was first calculated on July 1, 2016, and publicly released on August 15, 2016, by Corporate Knights and As You Sow. The current list has been updated with data through January 31, 2023.
The Clean200 companies are ranked by their clean revenues in U.S. dollars. The data set is developed through assessment of a company’s revenue that aligns with the definitions laid out in the Corporate Knights Sustainable Economy Taxonomy, primarily sourced from Corporate Knights research. To be eligible, a company must earn more than 10% of total revenues from clean sources.
The Clean200 uses negative screens. It excludes all oil and gas companies, all utilities that generate less than 50% of their power from green sources, the top 100 coal companies measured by reserves, the top 100 oil and gas companies as measured by reserves, as well as all fossil fuel companies, majority fossil-fired utilities, pipeline and oil-field-services companies, and other fossil-fuel-related companies screened on As You Sow’s Fossil Free Funds. In addition, the Clean200 excludes weapons companies, including major military arms manufacturers found on the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Top 100 arms-producing and military services list, as well as cluster munitions, nuclear weapons and civilian firearm manufacturers screened on As You Sow’s Weapon Free Funds. The Clean200 also excludes palm oil, paper/pulp, rubber, timber, cattle and soy producers that are screened on As You Sow’s Deforestation Free Funds; companies that use child or forced labour, are involved in the manufacture of harmful pesticides, and that engage in negative climate lobbying are not included. The full list of exclusionary screens is provided below.
Clean200 Negative Screens | Criteria | # Excluded |
---|---|---|
Blocking climate policy | Categorized by the InfluenceMap lobbying red flag metric, which highlights companies that are engaged in corporate lobbying on climate change. (Source: CK) | 2 |
Cement carbon laggards | Companies in the cement industry that were divested from by Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM). (Source: CK) | 0 |
Deforestation-risk agribusiness producer/trader | Company engages in deforestation in South America and Southeast Asia as deemed by Chain Reaction research, Deforestation Free Funds, or was divested from by NBIM. (Source: CK, AYS) | 5 |
Coal Industry | Company has coal industry classification, or is found on the Global Coal Exit list from Urgewald. (Source: CK + AYS) | 29 |
Oil & gas industry | Company has industry classification of oil/gas, or is found on the Global Oil/Gas Exit list from Urgewald. (Source: CK, AYS) | 10 |
Fossil-fired utilities | Company has industry classification of utilities, has fossil fuel power generation or gas distribution, and has less than 50% clean revenue, as calculated by Corporate Knights. (Source: CK, AYS) | 11 |
Fossil fuel financers | Company is found on the Banking on Climate Chaos list of the 60 largest commercial and investment banks that are lending to and underwriting debt/equity issuances of fossil fuel companies, or from Corporate Knights research. (Source: AYS) | 0 |
Fossil fuel insurers | Company is found on the Insure Our Future list of 30 leading primary insurers and reinsurers that are insuring and investing in coal, oil, gas. (Source: AYS) | 0 |
Conventional weapons | Company is found on the list of the top 100 military contractors, or company earns more than half of its revenue from conventional weapons, as tracked by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). (Source: CK) | 1 |
Prisons | Company is recommended for divestment by the Investigate project of the American Friends Service Committee. (Source: CK, AYS) | 0 |
Top 200 carbon reserve owners | Company ranks in The Carbon Underground 200™, compiled and maintained by FFI Solutions (formerly Fossil Free Indexes℠), which identifies the top 100 coal and the top 100 oil/gas publicly traded reserve holders globally. (Source: AYS) | 0 |
Controversial weapons | Company sells controversial weapons and is deemed ineligible for investment by NBIM and NZ SuperFund. (Source: CK) | 2 |
Illegal activity | Company’s ratio of fines, penalties or settlements/revenue for the most recent ranked year exceeds 1.0%. (Source: CK) | 2 |
Severe environmental damage | Identifies companies that have caused several environmental damage and have been excluded by NBIM. (Source: CK) | 1 |
Harmful pesticides | The top five pesticide manufacturers selling chemicals that pose serious hazards to human health and the environment. (Source: Unearthed) | 1 |
* From the companies eligible for the 2023 Clean200
The Clean200® List
Rank | Name | Country | GICS Sector |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Apple Inc | United States | Information Technology |
2 | Alphabet Inc | United States | Communication Services |
3 | Deutsche Telekom AG | Germany | Communication Services |
4 | Verizon Communications Inc | United States | Communication Services |
5 | Tesla Inc | United States | Consumer Discretionary |
6 | Agricultural Bank of China Ltd | China | Financials |
7 | TSMC | Taiwan | Information Technology |
8 | Iberdrola SA | Spain | Utilities |
9 | HP Inc | United States | Information Technology |
10 | Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd | China | Industrials |
11 | Schneider Electric SE | France | Industrials |
12 | Cisco Systems Inc | United States | Information Technology |
13 | Intel Corp | United States | Information Technology |
14 | Nucor Corp | United States | Materials |
15 | Siemens AG | Germany | Industrials |
16 | CRRC Corp Ltd | China | Industrials |
17 | SoftBank Corp | Japan | Communication Services |
18 | Unilever PLC | United Kingdom | Consumer Staples |
19 | KDDI Corp | Japan | Communication Services |
20 | Vestas Wind Systems A/S | Denmark | Industrials |
21 | LG Chem Ltd | Republic of Korea | Materials |
22 | Adidas AG | Germany | Consumer Discretionary |
23 | Tianneng Power International Ltd | Cayman Islands | Consumer Discretionary |
24 | LONGi Green Energy Technology Co Ltd | China | Information Technology |
25 | Steel Dynamics Inc | United States | Materials |
26 | Bank of China Ltd | China | Financials |
27 | BT Group PLC | United Kingdom | Communication Services |
28 | ABB Ltd | Switzerland | Industrials |
29 | SK Telecom Co Ltd | Republic of Korea | Communication Services |
30 | Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy SA | Spain | Industrials |
31 | Advanced Info Service PCL | Thailand | Communication Services |
32 | Indorama Ventures PCL | Thailand | Materials |
33 | BNP Paribas SA | France | Financials |
34 | Pfizer Inc | United States | Health Care |
35 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co | United States | Information Technology |
36 | EDP Energias de Portugal SA | Portugal | Utilities |
37 | CEMIG | Brazil | Utilities |
38 | Samsung SDI Co Ltd | Republic of Korea | Information Technology |
39 | Centrais Elétricas Brasileiras SA | Brazil | Utilities |
40 | Johnson Controls International PLC | Ireland | Industrials |
41 | Banco do Brasil SA | Brazil | Financials |
42 | Enerjisa Enerji AS | Turkey | Utilities |
43 | Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co Ltd | China | Industrials |
44 | BYD Co Ltd | China | Consumer Discretionary |
45 | Gilead Sciences Inc | United States td> | Health Care |
46 | Bristol-Myers Squibb Co | United States | Health Care |
47 | China Yangtze Power Co Ltd | China | Utilities |
48 | Alstom SA | France | Industrials |
49 | Sanofi SA | France | Health Care |
50 | Carrier Global Corp | United States | Industrials |
51 | Shin-Etsu Chemical Co Ltd | Japan | Materials |
52 | Nine Dragons Paper (Holdings) Ltd | Bermuda | Materials |
53 | Kone Oyj | Finland | Industrials |
54 | DS Smith PLC | United Kingdom | Materials |
55 | Rexel SA | France | Industrials |
56 | Outokumpu Oyj | Finland | Materials |
57 | Kering SA | France | Consumer Discretionary |
58 | SAP SE | Germany | Information Technology |
59 | Union Pacific Corp | United States | Industrials |
60 | JinkoSolar Holding Co Ltd | Cayman Islands | Information Technology |
61 | VMware Inc | United States | Information Technology |
62 | Umicore SA | Belgium | Materials |
63 | Energisa SA | Brazil | Utilities |
64 | Merck KGaA | Germany | Health Care |
65 | BCE Inc | Canada | Communication Services |
66 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson | Sweden | Information Technology |
67 | Ecolab Inc | United States | Materials |
68 | Telus Corp | Canada | Communication Services |
69 | Air Liquide SA | France | Materials |
70 | Capital One Financial Corp | United States | Financials |
71 | NIO Inc | Cayman Islands | Consumer Discretionary |
72 | Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd | Japan | Consumer Discretionary |
73 | Applied Materials Inc | United States | Information Technology |
74 | Prysmian SpA | Italy | Industrials |
75 | Nordex SE | Germany | Industrials |
76 | Kingspan Group PLC | Ireland | Industrials |
77 | Panasonic Corp | Japan | Consumer Discretionary |
78 | Lenovo Group Ltd | Hong Kong | Information Technology |
79 | Swisscom AG | Switzerland | Communication Services |
80 | Ørsted A/S | Denmark | Utilities |
81 | Bank of Communications Co Ltd | China | Financials |
82 | Nokia Oyj | Finland | Information Technology |
83 | Industria de Diseño Textil SA | Spain | Consumer Discretionary |
84 | Industrial Bank Co Ltd | China | Financials |
85 | International Business Machines Corp | United States | Information Technology |
86 | Smurfit Kappa Group PLC | Ireland | Materials |
87 | Toray Industries Inc | Japan | Materials |
88 | Commercial Metals Co | United States | Materials |
89 | Essity AB (publ) | Sweden | Consumer Staples |
90 | Li Auto Inc | Cayman Islands | Consumer Discretionary |
91 | Yadea Group Holdings Ltd | Cayman Islands | Consumer Discretionary |
92 | Nexans SA | France | Industrials |
93 | Asustek Computer Inc | Taiwan | Information Technology |
94 | Sims Ltd | Australia | Materials |
95 | China Everbright Environment Group Ltd | Hong Kong | Industrials |
96 | Waste Connections US Inc | Canada | Industrials |
97 | Singapore Telecommunications Ltd | Singapore | Communication Services |
98 | Signify NV | Netherlands | Industrials |
99 | Henkel AG & Co KGaA | Germany | Consumer Staples |
100 | Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd | China | Industrials |
101 | Akzo Nobel NV | Netherlands | Materials |
102 | Evonik Industries AG | Germany | Materials |
103 | Brambles Ltd | Australia | Industrials |
104 | Astellas Pharma Inc | Japan | Health Care |
105 | Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd | Taiwan | Communication Services |
106 | Giant Manufacturing Co Ltd | Taiwan | Consumer Discretionary |
107 | CSX Corp | United States | Industrials |
108 | Xerox Holdings Corp | United States | Information Technology |
109 | Rogers Communications Inc | Canada | Communication Services |
110 | Companhia Paranaense de Energia | Brazil | Utilities |
111 | Trane Technologies PLC | Ireland | Industrials |
112 | Norfolk Southern Corp | United States | Industrials |
113 | Koninklijke KPN NV | Netherlands | Communication Services |
114 | East Japan Railway Co | Japan | Industrials |
115 | Huaneng Lancang River Hydropower Inc | China | Utilities |
116 | Konica Minolta Inc | Japan | Information Technology |
117 | Dassault Systèmes SE | France | Information Technology |
118 | GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Ltd | Cayman Islands | Information Technology |
119 | Canadian National Railway Co | Canada | Industrials |
120 | Engie Brasil Energia SA | Brazil | Utilities |
121 | Danaher Corp | United States | Health Care |
122 | Stanley Black & Decker Inc | United States | Industrials |
123 | GEM Co Ltd | China | Materials |
124 | China Railway Signal & Communication Corp Ltd | China | Information Technology |
125 | FirstGroup PLC | United Kingdom | Industrials |
126 | Acciona SA | Spain | Utiliies |
127 | Rengo Co Ltd | Japan | Materials |
128 | Shimano Inc | Japan | Consumer Discretionary |
129 | Risen Energy Co Ltd | China | Information Technology |
130 | Veolia Environnement SA | France | Utilities |
131 | GS Yuasa Corp | Japan | Industrials |
132 | Canadian Solar Inc | Canada | Information Technology |
133 | WSP Global Inc | Canada | Industrials |
134 | West Fraser Timber Co Ltd | Canada | Materials |
135 | Light Serviços de Eletricidade SA | Brazil | Utilities |
136 | Lopez Holdings Corp | Philippines | Utilities |
137 | Autodesk Inc | United States | Information Technology |
138 | Brookfield Renewable Partners LP | Bermuda | Utilities |
139 | Koninklijke Philips NV | Netherlands | Health Care |
140 | Johnson Matthey PLC | United Kingdom | Materials |
141 | Proximus NV | Belgium | Communication Services |
142 | Kimberly-Clark Corp | United States | Consumer Staples |
143 | Rockwool A/S | Denmark | Industrials |
144 | Clean Harbors Inc | United States | Industrials |
145 | Ricoh Co Ltd | Japan | Information Technology |
146 | China Three Gorges Renewables Group Co Ltd | China | Utilities |
147 | Intesa Sanpaolo SpA | Italy | Financials |
148 | Zhuzhou CRRC Times Electric Co Ltd | China | Industrials |
149 | Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd | Bermuda | Utilities |
150 | KGHM Polska Miedz SA | Poland | Materials |
151 | Swatch Group AG | Switzerland | Consumer Discretionary |
152 | EnerSys | United States | Industrials |
153 | Celestica Inc | Canada | Information Technology |
154 | Stadler Rail AG | Switzerland | Industrials |
155 | Equinix Inc | United States | Real Estate |
156 | McCormick & Company Inc | United States | Consumer Staples |
157 | Acuity Brands Inc | United States | Industrials |
158 | Sherwin-Williams Co | United States | Materials |
159 | MLS Co Ltd | China | Information Technology |
160 | Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP | Brazil | Utilities |
161 | Camel Group Co Ltd | China | Industrials |
162 | Suzlon Energy Ltd | India | Industrials |
163 | First Solar Inc | United States | Information Technology |
164 | Cascades Inc | Canada | Materials |
165 | Puma SE | Germany | Consumer Discretionary |
166 | Dupont De Nemours Inc | United States | Materials |
167 | Cheng Loong Corp | Taiwan | Materials |
168 | Wartsila Oyj Abp | Finland | Industrials |
169 | Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd | Canada | Industrials |
170 | Packaging Corp of America | United States | Materials |
171 | China Datang Corp Renewable Power Co Ltd | China | Utilities |
172 | West Japan Railway Co | Japan | Industrials |
173 | Valeo SA | France | Consumer Discretionary |
174 | Schnitzer Steel Industries Inc | United States | Materials |
175 | Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd | Cayman Islands | Information Technology |
176 | Atea ASA | Norway | Information Technology |
177 | Renewi PLC | United Kingdom | Industrials |
178 | Greif Inc | United States | Materials |
179 | Companhia de Eletricidade do Estado da Bahia Coelba | Brazil | Utilities |
180 | Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd | Cayman Islands | Consumer Discretionary |
181 | Workday Inc | United States | Information Technology |
182 | STMicroelectronics NV | Netherlands | Information Technology |
183 | Eisai Co Ltd | Japan | Health Care |
184 | CapitaLand Investment Ltd | Singapore | Real Estate |
185 | Meridian Energy Ltd | New Zealand | Utilities |
186 | ASM International NV | Netherlands | Information Technology |
187 | GMexico Transportes SAB de CV | Mexico | Industrials |
188 | Central Japan Railway Co | Japan | Industrials |
189 | Lanxess AG | Germany | Materials |
190 | Brookfield Renewable Corp | Canada | Utilities |
191 | Celsia SA ESP | Colombia | Utilities |
192 | Sterling & Wilson Solar Ltd | India | Industrials |
193 | City Developments Ltd | Singapore | Real Estate |
194 | Gotion High-tech Co Ltd | China | Industrials |
195 | Verbund AG | Austria | Utilities |
196 | Natura & Co Holding SA | Brazil | Consumer Staples |
197 | Metropolitan Bank and Trust Co | Philippines | Financials |
198 | Viatris Inc | United States | Health Care |
199 | AECOM | United States | Industrials |
200 | EDP Renovaveis SA | Spain | Utilities |
Clean200 2023 Update: Investing in a Clean Energy Future by Michael Yow, Matthew Malinsky, Toby Heaps, and Andrew Behar is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://www.asyousow.org/report-page/2023-clean200-investing-in-a-clean-energy-future