As You Sow

View Original

Union Pacific Corp: Greater Disclosure of Material Corporate Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Data

<- Back to Resolution Tracker

WHEREAS:  Numerous studies by respected organizations such as The Wall Street Journal, Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley, McKinsey, PwC and BCG have pointed to the material benefits of a diverse workforce.

Companies should look to hire the best talent. However, Black and Latino applicants face recruitment challenges. Results of a meta-analysis study of 24 field experiments, dating back to 1990, found that, with identical resumes, White applicants receive, an average of 36 percent more callbacks than Black applicants and 24 percent more callbacks than Latino applicants.”

Promotion rates show how well diverse talent is nurtured at a company. Unfortunately, women and non-White employees experience “a broken rung” in their careers. For every 100 men who are promoted, only 86 women are promoted. Non-White women are particularly impacted, comprising 17 percent of the entry-level workforce and only 4 percent of executives. Employees with the potential for advancement have a higher retention rate.

Morgan Stanley has found that: “Employee retention that is above industry peer averages can indicate the presence of competitive advantage. This advantage may lead to higher levels of future profitability than past financial performance would indicate.” Companies with high employee satisfaction have also been linked to annualized outperformance of over two percent.

Union Pacific has stated “From an employee’s perspective, a diverse culture increases engagement, improves morale and supports safety. From a business perspective, diversity improves the company’s decision making, problem solving, and strategic thinking, which translates into a competitive advantage with bottom-line results.” However, Union Pacific has not shared recruitment, retention, and promotion data by gender, race, or ethnicity. Its reporting is insufficient for investors to determine the effectiveness of its human capital management programs.

Between September 2020 and September 2021, the number of S&P 100 companies releasing recruitment rate data by gender, race and ethnicity increased by 234 percent, companies releasing retention rate data increased by 79 percent, and companies releasing promotion rate data increased by 379 percent.

Direct competitor Norfolk Southern shares recruitment and retention data by gender, race and ethnicity and Boeing, FedEx, General Motors, Johnson Controls, along with many others, release more data on the effectiveness of their human capital management programs than Union Pacific does. Union Pacific is increasingly a laggard in its decision to continue to withhold these data sets.

BE IT RESOLVED:  Shareholders request that Union Pacific Corp. (“Union Pacific”) report to shareholders on the effectiveness of the Company's diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. The reporting should be done at reasonable expense, exclude proprietary information, and address outcomes using quantitative metrics for recruitment, retention, and promotion of employees, including data by gender, race, and ethnicity.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT:  Quantitative data is sought so that investors can assess, understand, and compare the effectiveness of companies’ diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and apply this analysis to investors’ portfolio management and securities’ selection process.

Resolution Details

Company: 
Union Pacific Corp

Lead Filer: 
As You Sow

Year: 2022

Filing Date: 
November 2021

Initiative(s): Diversity Data Disclosure

Status: Resolution Withdrawn, Agreement Reached

Download PDF